Ciekawe co by się stało, gdybym spytała o to Astarte, nie Astoreth :-)

Poniższe zostało napisane podczas tripu na Twitterze (polecam, FOLLOW @agquarx). Ponieważ Twitter to mikro-blog, wpisy są w odwrotnie chronologicznej kolejności. Zachowałam markery czasu by łatwiej je było czytać w przeciwnej kolejności. Zwolennikom odpowiadania pod cytatem zwracam uwagę, o ile łatwiej było by gdyby były we właściwej kolejności...Tekst jest po angielsku, ale jeśli głośno krzykniecie, przetłumoczę go na polski. -=- Yes, you know where it lead a true discording priestess of Astarte. I DIDN'T MAKE IT! ERIS DID IT! YES! ERIS! SIEG HEIL ERIS! ALL HAIL ERIS! 5 minutes ago via web Universe is in constant CHANGE. She is born of CHAOS, not RANDOM or ORDER. You cannot inject RANDOM into ORDER to get CHAOS. RANDOM != CHAOS 6 minutes ago via web In other words: CAUSE <-> EFFECT dualism is bogus (FALSE). EVENTS are created as entities go with their properties emergent by relation mesh 8 minutes ago via web If you ask Universe - HOW ARE WE HERE? She will gladly explain HOW, in small increments, so u are not overwhelmed. She is a nice girl :-) 9 minutes ago via web It is not true that Universe is silent. She is only silent if you ask WHY question, like (*ducking*) "WHY ARE WE HERE?".It's stupid question 10 minutes ago via web Budda is WRONG. Jesus is WRONG. Ron Hubbard is also WRONG. It is also BAD for you, because POISONOUS in large amounts. 11 minutes ago via web It is not true that "everything is connected to anything". Relational mesh is connected, but it is localized within each light cone (reffra) 12 minutes ago via web Oh yes, free agents are CREATING events as they go, by using PROPERTIES that are emergent from RELATION mesh IN-BETWEEN agents and Universe 14 minutes ago via web You cannot stop being free, because it would mean you cannot change your state ("move", relate to t, use a property by creating an event...) 15 minutes ago via web You can even act (and effectively), without stopping to be free, without consciousness, which means you DON'T FEEL THE FREE WILL FEELING! 17 minutes ago via web It is not true that you must act LIKE there is free will, even if there is really no free will. You must nothing. You are free. You EXIST 18 minutes ago via web FREE WILL is a religious term. What you really mean when u talk that maybe I have no free will, but you surely have it, you mean the FEELING 19 minutes ago via web It doesn't mean you have FREE WILL. You are free, but you have no free will. FW is not real. It cannot be realized (IT CANNOT BE, in short). 20 minutes ago via web But so is some (ANY, really) electron orbiting some (ANY, again) atom in your material body. Most entities have some degrees of freedom. 21 minutes ago via web If you are FREE it means you are not related in {THIS} context to THIS. FREEDOM means you have a choice of several paths (EVENTS) from TIME 22 minutes ago via web U really are NOT NOT NOT a member of society! There are only singular human beings, choosing "freely" (I can also demistyfy freedom :-)) 24 minutes ago via web That is why social graph sounds FUNNY. It supposes lines ("pseudo-relations") connecting vertices (realized as geometric points) graph of u 25 minutes ago via web Society is of course real. It just cannot be realized. You cannot line up several dozens of members of society and say - we have society 27 minutes ago via web There is no such thing (entity) as SOCIETY. There is HUMANITY (sum of all parts LIKE human (YES, EVEN THE DEAD!)), but not society. 28 minutes ago via web Yes, there are persons, who are not human persons. I don't mean other animals, I mean entities LIKE "society" or "normal (human) person". 29 minutes ago via web She is not human, but we can treat Universe LIKE a person. If u do it right, u won't fall into anthrophomorphism fallacy. She is not human! 30 minutes ago via web There are entities that EXIST in Her which are not part of reality. It simply means they cannot be realized. They *are* real. Samples? 32 minutes ago via web That is why if I want to refer to existing world around us, I say "reality realized". I mean what we get after we inter-act with Her. 33 minutes ago via web It is not proper to refer to those properties as "really real" or "not really real". Reality is by definition real, but it is not realized. 34 minutes ago via web Entities aquire (action! or EVENT) properties by us observing RELATIONS IN-BETWEEN (out-side of those entities). Universe is not an entity. 35 minutes ago via web Universe has no properties. Entities have no properties, it's all from relations in-between. She is not free, she is bound. Lost, now found 36 minutes ago via web In other words, SUMMONING OF THE MUSE is calling on MUSE by parts (talents? abilities? properties?). YE YE YE SUMMONING THE MUSE to help me 37 minutes ago via web SUMMON I could analyze (as schizophrenic people very often d) by pointing out it's SUM ON (something) if I summon angel call on GOD by PARTS 39 minutes ago via web I mean "calling" in sense of SUMMONING. Religion (and science) has memetic power (MANA) - it is wise to call on it's artifacts and use them 41 minutes ago via web Us ANGELS (ELEMENTAL BEINGS, PARTS OF GOD) if you are calling religion, ATOMS (or PARTICLES OF MATTER, ELEMENTAL) if you are calling science 42 minutes ago via web @godlessgirl Do *u* maybe follow my twitter course of practical magick or applied memetics? :-) 44 minutes ago via web You cannot observe properties of an entity from in-side of this entity. You must move your Self out-side of it's system. U observe relations 45 minutes ago via web Faeries, we are all faeries - Richard Feinman on his death bed. about 1 hour ago via web @justvincezzz HOWTO => "ASTARTE IS A GODDESS FREE, I PUT ASTARTE TO THE RIGHT OF ME, MIRROR IS ON THE LEFT SIDE, IT IS A RIGHT SIDE" :-) about 1 hour ago via web in reply to justvincezzz You cannot divide space indefinitely - if you do it too much, you'll lose ability to divide any futher, because space stops being euclidean about 1 hour ago via web There are 33 levels of angels or 33 free states for an atom (indivisible elemental particle of matter, a-tom means in-divisible in Greek) about 1 hour ago via web { and } are mnemonics for angel wings. THIS has a nature of human (person), {THIS} has a nature of angel. It is hard to explain, but think! about 1 hour ago via web {THIS} refers to the context ABOVE this context, where ABOVE is not referring to any hierarchy of contexts, we could write BELOW! {{THIS}}? about 1 hour ago via web In other words THIS refers (has a designate in) to current tweet. Current flows from RIGHT to LEFT. Schizophrenia is lots of FUN! about 1 hour ago via web The word "this" (THIS) is referring to the first level symbolic context, or self-directed to-ward current text (sequence of symbols). This. about 1 hour ago via web You cannot test Universe from out-side of Universe, she has no out-side. Don't imagine Universe as a expanding sphere. She is not LIKE this about 1 hour ago via web Relations are in-between and Properties are out-between (with-out) - you can only see properties by testing entity from outside of system about 1 hour ago via web Universe has no out-side. She has in-side (can (has potential) to contain all (relations in a mesh)). Relations are not properties. about 1 hour ago via web Entities (like BEINGS, for example ME or ASTARTE) are points of presence, not geometric points (POISON!). Geometric points simply aren't. about 1 hour ago via web @justvincezzz Do you follow my twitter course on magick or did you give up? ;-) about 1 hour ago via web in reply to justvincezzz Do not get into a mental trap (POISON, geometric kind) imagining relations as lines or curves connecting entities. They are not LIKE lines! about 1 hour ago via web There are relations in-between and points of presence bound in a mesh of relations. Relations do entities to have properties. Relations! about 1 hour ago via web I don't mean that Universe is pregnant with us and we are the children of the Universe, because it's just another, politically correct god! about 1 hour ago via web Even Universe has sex. Universe is she, BlackHole is he. She is fond of HOW questions and WHY questions make her angry and or silent. about 1 hour ago via web But I am strange and unusual - many people prefer to talk to devil who is male (he). I know, angels don't "really" have sex, but so what? about 1 hour ago via web For example, what is the name of angel who lead rebellion against God - is it LUCYFAIR (she) or LUCIFER (he). I'd rather talk to devil she! about 1 hour ago via web It is important if you do magick. Names are very important in magick. You first give them power (power to words or symbols), then u use them about 1 hour ago via web That is why I asked @TMinistry what is the correct spelling of that name - A.S.T.A.R.T.E or A.S.T.O.R.E.T.H (where dot is symbol for ALINKA) about 1 hour ago via web It is not a religion, but I am a priestess of Astarte (ME IS (EXISTS IN ANY OF) PRIESTESS OF CLASS ASTARTE). I believe she is talking to me! about 1 hour ago via web It is only because Astarte talks to me in English and we arite English from by beginning somewhere and putting symbols after that. POISON! about 1 hour ago via web RIGHT:LEFT can be also written LEFT:RIGHT, but by decree of Astarte we always assume it is AFTER left mirrored (LEFT:RIGHT not LEFT::RIGHT) about 1 hour ago via web To know which symbol is (on the) LEFT, you must know which symbol is (on the) RIGHT. You can turn this notion around 180 degrees (MIRROR) about 1 hour ago via web Faeries are never singletons, they are always dancing in circles. There is no hierarchy in-between fairies. Fairies, we are all fairies! :-) about 1 hour ago via web RIGHT and LEFT is also bogus, of course, just like SMALLER and BIGGER. You have to look at the thing to actually judge, which label choose about 1 hour ago via web ME LOVE ASTARTE EQUALS MIRROR LOVE RIGHT? IT IS ON THE RIGHT ISN'T IT. SO MIRROR IS ON THE LEFT OF ANGEL OF LOVE AND EQUALITY IS IN-BETWEEN about 1 hour ago via web She is not a FALSE goddess of course (natural defense alpha for a religious person) because she is not a goddess at all. She is goddess FREE about 1 hour ago via web Yes, that is how I am a priestess of Astarte (Astoreth), but I never "really" believe she is an existing, true member of class GODDESS. Is? about 1 hour ago via web ME :: ASTARTE =-= MIRROR :: RIGHT. Symbol MIRROR is defined as SYMBOL:SYMBOL. You must be a symbol processing entity to engage this symbol. about 1 hour ago via web ASTARTE is a free symbol. Put it to the right of bound symbol, ME (@SELF). MIRROR is on the left side, equal to the RIGHT (correct) side about 1 hour ago via web Astarte is a goddess, free. I put Astarte to the right of Me. Mirror is on the left side. It is a right side. FREE FROM APPLIED MEMETICS INC about 1 hour ago via web "Don't stare into MIRROR too long, or DEVIL might take your soul and you will be AFRAID in "HELL" for all eternity (action!FEAR over TIME) about 1 hour ago via web Now you know why christian mythology often makes a lot of hoopla about operation of staring into a MIRROR to make it UNEXIST religion SELF about 1 hour ago via web We get - FEAR NOT THE DEVIL, DEVIL IS NOT GOOD, by GOD assumes LOVE IS NOT FEAR, DEVIL IS PART OF GOD, LOVE THE DEVIL because GOD IS LOVE :) about 1 hour ago via web GOD-=LOVE=-GOOD (NOT NOT EVIL because EVIL IS GOOD and GOOD IS EVIL un GOD) by GOD-=FEAR=-LOVE, DEVIL is EVIL (NOT GOOD) by DEVIL-=FEAR=-NOT about 2 hours ago via web GOD is good and DEVIL is EVIL (rhymes!). SATAN is not really EVIL because it doesn't rhyme, I suppose? about 2 hours ago via web FEAR is also useful, of course, but if you have certain constructions based on FEAR ordered to be assumed TRUE and (TRUE:FALSE) it's POISON about 2 hours ago via web We chose to oppose LOVE with FEAR because you should be afraid of memetic poisons, th literally *eat your mind from inside out (outside-in)* about 2 hours ago via web To attach to religious tradition and make it little bit more magickal and cool we can call mirror relation ("::") - "LOVE". Opposite FEAR about 2 hours ago via web Opposition is SYMBOL:SYMBOL - two dots (any combination of two from set TRUE, FALSE, RANDOM, CHAOS, MIRROR). It can be pronounced "LIKE". about 2 hours ago via web NOT-EXISTS can be also referred as MIRROR. Written as SYMBOL::SYMBOL (four dots, because we avoid counting fifth again, it's not free!) about 2 hours ago via web It is logical, it simply is not the learned in school, two dimensional logic. It has five states, TRUE, FALSE, RANDOM, CHAOS, NOT-EXISTS about 2 hours ago via web So, EVIL is NOT GOOD, GOOD is NOT EVIL, BAD is not EVIL, it's just NOT GOOD, NOT BAD is actually GOOD, I don't try to show lng isn't logical about 2 hours ago via web It is not enough to write into the "sacred text" - REPLICATE ME WITHOUT ANY CHANGES. Change is inevitable, it's a law of nature. No contest. about 2 hours ago via web Human mind cannot stand such poisons and tried to get rid of them, but without special help (Memetic Defense System) you will do it wrong... about 2 hours ago via web They didn't write SATAN, they wrote DEVIL. They didn't write DEVIL, they wrote THEOTHER, they didn't write THEOTHER, they wrote EVILONE see? about 2 hours ago via web They did it by simple namespace invasion or augmenting a symbol with a closed (circularly) connected newly created symbol, ref to 1 another about 2 hours ago via web Hebrews used another, weaker technique too - omitting symbols they didn't like. You were supposed to read INVISIBLE symbols, and correctly! about 2 hours ago via web If you let a religious person defend some Article of Faith by reason, she will inevitably create more and more symbols to hide the dualism about 2 hours ago via web Memetic poison is creating an infinitely deep semantic net set on false dualism of some symbols, like GOOD and EVIL or PORN and MAINSTREAM about 2 hours ago via web Are you confused? You are POISONED if you are not immunized by our (patent pending) Memetic Defense Systems by us, Applied Memetics Inc about 2 hours ago via web Religion uses *same trick* with third symbol - DEVIL, which is (read it!) not SATAN, but SATAN, but a part of GOD, but EVIL and GOD is GOOD about 2 hours ago via web This kind of "thinking" is directly poisoning your ability to think. You are told to accept BOTH as TRUE - GOD -=-SATAN, SATAN NOT -=- GOD about 2 hours ago via web So, a logical person would ask - so is EVIL opposing GOOD? Is SATAN opposition of GOD? Religion short circuits your logic by assuming FALSE about 2 hours ago via web For example religion teaches us that GOD is good and SATAN, which symbol is directly derived from GOD, is EVIL and GOOD opposses EVIL about 2 hours ago via web That is how religious poisoning *works*. Religion teaches you to take on faith (assuming TRUE value) to notions that are "dualisms" - poison about 2 hours ago via web So we have at least two words that fail to mean anything - they have no object they are reffer to - PORN, EROTIC. All movies are MAINSTREAM about 2 hours ago via web Some people add another symbol to it - EROTIC movies, but it only hides the problem by making up a false third symbol. EROTIC is not defined about 2 hours ago via web The PORN <-> MAINSTREAM pseudo-dualism is obviously FALSE. You cannot define symbol PORN in opposition to MAINSTREAM. It's very hard :-) about 2 hours ago via web Let's take PORN and MAINSTREAM (member of class MOVIES). The definition goes something LIKE that - porn is a movie that we consider porn :-) about 2 hours ago via web @justvincezzz By not mentioning any particular drug I avoid the argument ad hominem aka YOU ONLY WANT TO LEGALIZE YOUR POISON, PUNK :-) about 2 hours ago via web @justvincezzz Good luck :-) about 2 hours ago via web in reply to justvincezzz @justvincezzz It's universal calculus on symbols ;-) about 2 hours ago via web in reply to justvincezzz @justvincezzz Any type. Drugs as set. This rule goes on every each drug in turn and tests it. Do you have something in mind? #drugpolicy about 2 hours ago via web in reply to justvincezzz What do *you* think, tweeps? Am I insane? They say that if you don't understand logic, you also don't understand u don't understand logic :) about 2 hours ago via web The only reason fighting drug abuse is so hard that it's a lost cause is BECAUSE THAT IS HOW THE REALITY REALIZED WORKS. Deal with it! about 2 hours ago via web The only way to deal with irresistible temptation is consent to it being a part of you and accepting it. This way you can deal with it. about 2 hours ago via web Maybe I should replace LawAbidingPopulation in opposition to DrugUsingPopulation. There also of course exists CasualDrugUsers, by RANDOM about 2 hours ago via web Government x Order -=- DrugUsers x Mafia -- just a simple proportion anyone can solve. Wake up drug prohibitionists - you solution is insane about 2 hours ago via web Mafia (CHAOS) is proportionally stronger reaction to ORDER (drug laws, prohibition by government) because the set of drug users is weaker :) about 2 hours ago via web Mafia is not RANDOM, because it is deliberately created by living (CHAOTIC born) logical agents - people, thus drug enforcement is EVIL :-) about 2 hours ago via web If ORDER (government) tries to prohibit drugs (ORDER), it makes the drug users minority (LESS "mass") give birth to mafia (A LOT of CHAOS) about 2 hours ago via web Action supposes reaction of equal momentum and opposite direction. If forces of ORDER create more ORDER, we'll have emergency of CHAOTIC^2. about 2 hours ago via web Take ORDER and CHAOS. It's not really an opposition, we also have RANDOM as a third vertices of a triangle. Also RANDOM !=== CHAOS. about 2 hours ago via web If not otherwise stated from now on words in context are sentence-case, symbols (words out of context) all upper-case. #magick about 2 hours ago via web We actually never know if this is labeled DAY or NIGHT simply by stating the time of DAY (which part). We must look out and see. #logic about 2 hours ago via web It really is like on this picture everyone knows - the Chineese two opposites merging and pushing out each other in a circular fashion. about 2 hours ago via web Which regresses to "take infinite amount of parts of day. each of those belongs to set labeled with symbol DAY or symbol NIGHT" - it's DAY. about 2 hours ago via web Take symbols NIGHT and DAY. They are not really oppositions, because they are defined by stating LIKE day is part of day which is not night about 2 hours ago via web Such dualisms (direct supposed oppositions of two symbols) are most of the time defined in a circular fashion, that is - definition by faith about 2 hours ago via web @TMinistry I'm about the "evil" consort of Yahwe which is mentioned in bible only by allusion to avoid calling her in. U know, Astoreth :-) about 2 hours ago via web in reply to TMinistry In other words: EVERY DUALISM IS FALSE. Like - Night versus Day, God versus Satan, Google vs Apple, Order vs Chaos, White vs Black... #logic about 2 hours ago via web Do not believe that any direct opposition of symbols is true. It is definitely false. The relation is at least triangular, three symbols :-) about 3 hours ago via web @TMinistry Which is the correct spelling - Astarte or Astoreth? If I type Astarte in Mac OS X textbox and request T2S - it pronounces later. about 3 hours ago via web Astoreth, you are the killer of many, the lover of many more, my priest wanted me to pleasure him with my mouth and I'm only 13, HOWTO?